The Game's Gone Crazier

For all the latest on the exploits of Uncle Festa, Godfather Cellino, Friar Brian, Old Big Gob, GianFredo Zola, Butterfingers Green, 'Arry the Albatross, The Grand Puppet Master, Il Duce Di Canio, Timmy Sherwood and a cast of thousands!

Friday, 26 April 2013

Shame on Brendan Rodgers and Liverpool

Rehabilitation of the player? What the hell is Rodgers going on about? Suarez hasn't been to prison - though some do get locked up for physical assault!

This isn't about rehabilitation, this is about punishment pure and simple, and how could the ban be for anything less than 10 games, given the little shit was suspended for 7 matches for his first biting offence in Holland?

Liverpool FC keep wriggling, desperate to be seen to be on the side of Suarez in the hope that he will then agree to stay. They engineered or allowed the link with the 96, which was shameful in itself, and now the club and its manager are prostituting themselves for the little biting pimp, doing anything and everything to keep him on board in the hope he won't give them a black eye by demanding a move.

Liverpool were once a proud club. Now all dignity has been sacrificed.

11 comments:

  1. shame on you little tin pot blogger trying get a hits from lfc fans with these cheap stunts. get a life you hypocrite.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Shame on Brendan Rodgers and
    Liverpool? Useless fellow...both U and ur Bottom under-Average Club Westham...Dnt u have Shame?

    ReplyDelete
  3. as per useual you are mistacken about this so called bite,to be a bite he would have had to leave teeth marks in the flesh but none were visable .so how can it be a bite. And ten match ban for sucking seems a bit harsh.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Suarez was not banned for 7 games for the bite in Holland, check your facts, also note that by the FA's own admission they cannot use the previous bite as a benchmark (rightly or wrongly) personally I feel wrongly. There is no question that the "Independant Panel" had been influenced by media frenzy, PM comments etc. Ban him absolutely but judge him on the offence commited. Before you quote "previous offences" this is his first in this country for violent conduct for which he is being banned.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Liverpool aren't the only ones saying it's harsh. Shame on you Rio and fat Sam. I'm disgusted with you all.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rubbish article, rubbish writer. ps that's for getting Andy fit for us and taking Joe blob as well. lol.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lol who writes this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've never read so much racist rubbish in my life. We British pride ourselves on accepting multi cultures so why should an exception be made to Suarez and Uruguay? To give more than a 3 match ban for this is probably even a breach of human rights so Suarez could probably even sue. Even if the incident was a bit extreme he should be treated rather than punished as I'm afraid this will not solve the problem it will only compound it.

    As for Rodgers he should be commended for the loyalty shown to his best player under the circumstances.

    I notice you are quick to write these ridiculous articles but never seem to respond when someone has a valid point.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Shame on u for writing this blog.I know its LS that's why this matter is being blown out of proportion.FA (Ferguson Association has two separate ways for punishing the player one for Britts & other for foreign players.The whole drama is bullshit & u too..

    ReplyDelete
  10. Shame on your hooker mother shagging that biker, orherwise we may not have had this insightful garbage.

    ReplyDelete
  11. FckU! Lick your italian heroes' asshole.

    ReplyDelete